Europe September 29, 2010
reactions broken down to 76
Paolo Giaretta
In PD there is an anthropological issue than political? I think so to see the reactions of the 76 displaced to the document, before they were corrected by the wise words of the Secretary Bersani Management. In
parties that I went through before entering the building of the Democratic Party - the Christian Democrats, the PPI, the Margherita - the reaction would have been different, such as: "the Secretary considers the document a useful contribution to the debate that will come under close scrutiny organs of the party. " Only hypocrisy? No, the adoption of a style.
But here you have heard about for the opponent of the atomic bomb, of cowardice, seasoned with the usual expressions charge (a classic in the history of the left) of divisive intentions. In short: the Party (with a capital P) has spoken, the Congress is been done and there is nothing to discuss. I must say that the concerns I have expressed in my area were not substantive criticism (hardly anyone had read the document). There was rather a reflection of well-founded fear (given the comments of directors) of the dangers of divisions, but especially the idea that the public debate did not do well at the party. In short, it would seem that democratic centralism is alive and still lots of us.
The beauty is that we should take quite seriously the document of "young Turks" in reality the five closest collaborators of the Secretary.
an important document and not occasional. Just in this document speaks of a Pd affection "from rickets organizational uncertainty of identity, political ungovernability." Face. If he said Fioroni ...
Equally significant is the envy he felt towards Veltroni. A kind of liberation. Now we can say that the idea veltroniana to deconstruct and modernize the party (always with a capital P) is the cause of all evils. An aside to be closed forever, and no matter whether the Democratic Party is the legitimate son of the season of the Olive and the ongoing communications. Still uses the above-mentioned document of the Young Turks, where he describes the speech at the Lingotto Veltroni: "summa theoretical vision of an eclectic Italy, borrowed from all narrative dominated the small tour of our ruling classes. " Legitimate criticism, of course, is as legitimate criticism of Rosy Bindi, a fact which is presented as an alternative to the primary, with another platform. The fact remains, however: with the eclectic vision of Veltroni, sanctioned by the votes of millions of citizens in the primaries, took 34 percent of the votes and with strong vision organizzativistica, an archaeological pre labourism Blair of these leaders, we are in a past year by a 41 per cent of Italians who were very or somewhat confident of Pd to a paltry 26 percent . So
the anthropological question brings us back to politics. Roll up your sleeves for sure. It is a beautiful expression. But rolling up your sleeves let 's see if the path is right. Why in a country bent from a crisis that is ethical, economic, perspective, assisting all'indecoroso astonished by the spectacle of the right, one might expect that voters will look around, but we do not look. We work for the company says Bersani, right. But when customers are falling what does a company? It can change the management. This we have already done and would be a mistake to change it ahead of time. You can update the product and make a more attractive packaging. The only thing that can not be do is put on the market the old models and blame customers for not buying them.
0 comments:
Post a Comment